tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8176002456502671957.post5407497153761026530..comments2023-05-02T01:22:44.465-07:00Comments on The Girl's Gone Raw: Oafs of Office?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06410269914958186965noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8176002456502671957.post-21738933705643916062012-07-19T23:08:57.728-07:002012-07-19T23:08:57.728-07:00This was also the case in the Wisconsin v. Vernon ...This was also the case in the Wisconsin v. Vernon Hershberger case in which County and State "authorities" pursued and achieved a search warrant without being true public servants. They were not duly accepted public servants because they lacked oaths of office as well as bonds. In Wisconsin, according to the its Constitution, you must have an oath of office on file as well as a bond. None of those who were responsible for getting a judge to sign a warrant had oaths of office or bonds on file.<br />Farmer Vernon filed a motion to dismiss based partially on those grounds. The judge denied even knowing the law about oaths and bonds, even though all statues and designations were cited in the motion to dismiss. The corruption in government to deprive us of our rights is moving fast and hard since 2010. We must stop it. There is always jury nullification. <br />Jury nullification is every jurors right to judge not only fact but law. Jurors can rule by their verdicts that laws are unjust and acquit the defendant. That was how the public rid itself of the prohibition laws in the 1920's and 30's.<br />But guess what, judge Guy Reynold in Vernon's case ruled that jury nullification cannot be mentioned during the trial. Now you know how judges who work for the governments taking actions against citizens stack the deck against citizens. They violate their oaths of office to protect the people according to both State and Federal Constitutions. <br />What can everyone do about it? Can we sue the judges who violate us? Sure but it will be another judge that will rule and manipulate the jury in that case. So where can we achieve justice in such a corrupt system? I have no answer other than for hordes of people to appear at such trials and wreck havoc via demonstrations. I do not mean simply hundreds of people. We need thousands of people.<br />Farmer Vernon Hershberger's case is scheduled for September 25, 2012 at the Baraboo County Courthouse. Please plan to be there for the week. In case dates change, keep updated with David Gumpert at TheCompletePatient.com.<br />Aajonus Vonderplanitz<br /> http://www.wewant2live.com/is-aajonus-for-real-who-wrote-the-books-that-bear-his-name/Aajonus Vonderplanitzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01875705173409054643noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8176002456502671957.post-14745005240492694342012-03-12T17:49:33.155-07:002012-03-12T17:49:33.155-07:00While I think it's true not all individuals ar...While I think it's true not all individuals are required by law to have oaths of office on file, it seems many of those involved in the Rawesome case are. And it is disturbing that so many (more than I've published here, in fact) are missing. As to "what difference it make[s]"... in the long-run, well, that remains to be seen. My hope is that all this, when brought more to light, can remind law enforcement officials that they too - and not just constituents - are bound by law as well. Whether we all agree with that system of law is another topic entirely... In any case, I expect we'll want to continue watching this whole thing. People are beginning to wake up, and as they do, they're not so happy with what they see.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06410269914958186965noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8176002456502671957.post-83917124569380634682012-03-12T15:00:26.390-07:002012-03-12T15:00:26.390-07:00Not all individuals that do business as "gove...Not all individuals that do business as "government" are required by law to take and subscribe an oath of office. What difference does it make that your oppressors have sworn an oath to support pieces of paper that they force on you at gunpoint?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8176002456502671957.post-63904093048796498322012-02-28T16:01:49.122-08:002012-02-28T16:01:49.122-08:00From a Facebook exchange, posted with permission f...From a Facebook exchange, posted with permission from my friend Mako. (Follow me on Facebook by visiting >> https://www.facebook.com/pages/TheGirlsGoneRawcom/187273177976472 << and clicking 'Like'.) <br /><br />Mako: hella intriguing. I didn't know Health Specialist III's needed to take oaths of office. To me, it sounded like a glorified health inspector. Does an REHS have to swear in?<br /><br />Angela Doss: I don't have all the answers either... But the info certainly raises questions, at the very least. And since these folks' positions supposedly exist for our benefit and/or protection, it seems We the People (especially me) should at least be better informed.<br /><br />Angela Doss: And anyway, why would one group of government agents be required to take oaths and not another?? These are things I want to learn. <br /><br />Mako: from what I read, the argument is that the person who signed off on the raid technically needs to be sworn in (or on record of taking an oath). The only problem I see is that it is a secondary action stemming from an original directive, and that person has sworn the oath. An REHS is hired as the authority to determine what is "healthy" or "public health in environment" crap. That might be the loophole from the other end. but yes, intriguing<br /><br />Angela Doss: Yes, there could be loopholes galore... My point is that our government is accountable to us, and NOT the other way around. I simply want an explanation of this - because something looks a bit off to me.<br /><br />Mako: I think it boils down to Pat Kennelly, Food Safety Chief at the Food, Drug and Radiation Safety Division under California DPH. If he authorized the REHS, it's a sworn deal. To be honest, you can't drum up SWAT-esque resources unless it's a political move. Makes me wonder if he was directed by someone who needs supermarket support to be honest.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06410269914958186965noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8176002456502671957.post-41411493946749950172012-02-28T12:57:27.978-08:002012-02-28T12:57:27.978-08:00Wow .... did some lawyers initially find this spec...Wow .... did some lawyers initially find this specific information? Either way, the case should be completely thrown out just based on these "simple" mistakes!! What a circus of moronsNicole Wagnerhttp://www.nicolecwagner.comnoreply@blogger.com